Europe at a Crossroads: Neoliberalism, Oligarchy, and Crises

The Rise of Economic Liberalism and the Critique of Current Globalization

In an globalized world, the debate on globalisation is regularly positioned at the intersection of varied perspectives on freedom and balance. The work by the author Junon Moneta, which is not a pamphlet against globalization per se, seeks to reinvent the contours of a new humanism through the lens of organic interactions as envisioned by Aristotle. By decrying artificial transactions that fuel modern systems of oppression and precarity, Moneta leans on ancient principles to underline the failures of our world economy.

From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a recent concept. Its beginnings can be linked back to the ideas of David Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the England to expand its international economic reach. However, what was once a economic growth opportunity has transformed into a control mechanism by global finance, symbolized by the ascendancy of economic liberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions widespread in economic circles, the author demonstrates that neoliberalism is in reality a system based on old customs, going back to the era of early civilizations.

The objection also applies to the management of the United Europe, seen as a chain of surrenders that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites as opposed to protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a citizen support, is criticized. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only intensified the disbelief of the author regarding the EU’s ability to reform itself from within.

Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have caused the current circumstances, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also offers alternatives aimed at redefining European policies in a human-centered and fair perspective. The need for a complete revision of Union bodies and strategic orientations is a central theme that animates the entire discourse.

The work ventures more deeply into the critique of the authority mechanisms that control international economic flows. The exploration encompasses the method in which political and financial choices are guided by a small group of financial influencers, often at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, manipulated by means of institutions like the BIS and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a excessive domination on international economic strategies.

The author reveals how these institutions, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have over time manipulated stock exchanges and national economic systems to serve their interests. The neoliberal model, far from being a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is described as a enslavement tool, profiting a restricted circle at the expense of general well-being.

Particularly critical regarding the handling of the euro, the critic depicts the common currency not as a means of unification and stability, but rather as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The transition to the euro is characterized as a succession of bureaucratic measures that sidelined populations from decision-making processes, while amplifying internal differences within the Union.

The effects of these approaches appear in the growth of public indebtedness, economic stagnation, and a long period of austerity that has eroded standards of living across the continent. The critic emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the Union continues to risk future crises, potentially more destructive.

In summary, the manuscript calls for a democratic revolution where European citizens take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly increased transparency in decision-making processes and genuine civic involvement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.

Source about Approfondir ici

The thinker suggests that the answer resides in a renewal of democratic engagement, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that truly reflects the aspirations and needs of the citizens, instead of the profits of the financial elite.